Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Clervrain et al v. Fleischman et al
as 3:2022cv00530
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Shakira Sherlandy Joseph and Manetiony Clervrain
Defendant:
Jeff Fleischman, Sandy Coppola, Robert White, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02749
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lasnik v. Magness et al
as 1:2015cv02662
Plaintiff:
Kent Lasnik
Defendant:
Mark Magness , David Romero and Karl Wilmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. City of Federal Heights et al
as 1:2015cv01837
Defendant:
Curtis (I) Arganbright, City of Federal Heights, John Hess and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PS) Chipman v. Nelson et al
as 2:2011cv02770
Plaintiff:
Rickie Chipman- PROSE E-FILER
Defendant:
Marcia F. Nelson, Enloe Medical Center, Joseph M. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose Glynne v. WilMed Healthcare
as 11-1859
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ROSE L. GLYNNE, MD
Defendant - Appellant:
WILMED HEALTHCARE, d/b/a Wilson Medical Center
Defendant:
WILSON OB/GYN, PA, RICHARD E. HUDSON, Jointly and Severally, DANIEL P. MICHALAK, MD and others
Wilms v. Barton et al
as 1:2011cv00201
Plaintiff:
Cassondra Wilms
Defendant:
Officer Barton , Officer Bell , Officer Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-50243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Glynne v. WilMed Healthcare et al
as 5:2008cv00602
Defendant:
WilMed Healthcare, Wilson Ob/Gyn, PA, Richard E. Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Rose L. Glynne, MD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
