Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Rucker v. City of Aurora Police Department et al
as 1:2020cv02027
Defendant:
Amber Thomas, City of Aurora, Turf Pros Solutions and others
Plaintiff:
R.R., Darren Rucker and Darren (I) Rucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fa
Gamble v. Xpress Global Systems LLC
as 8:2019cv02788
Defendant:
Xpress Global Systems LLC
Plaintiff:
William Gamble
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. Xpress Global Systems, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00229
Defendant:
Xpress Global Systems, LLC and XGS Acquisition, LLC
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Reams v. Xpress Global Systems, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07427
Defendant:
Does, Xpress Global Systems, Inc. and Xpress Global Systems, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Reams
Eckinger v. Xpress Global Systems, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv03147
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Eckinger
Defendant:
Tara Oney, U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc., U.S. Xpress, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butler v. Xpress Global Systems Inc et al
as 2:2015cv01963
Plaintiff:
Le'Rhanze Butler
Defendant:
Xpress Global Systems Inc , U S Xpress Inc , U S Xpress Leasing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Edwards v. Everett et al.
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Gene Edwards
Defendant:
Kent Michael Everett, Xpress Global Systems, Inc. and U.S. Xpress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watts v. Xpress Global Systems, Inc.
as 1:2013cv02610
Plaintiff:
Joss Watts
Defendant:
Xpress Global Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
BEAIRD et al v. HILL et al
as 2:2011cv06882
Plaintiff:
DAVID N. BEAIRD and SARA BEAIRD
Defendant:
NANCY A. HILL, U.S. XPRESS LEASING, INC. , U.S. XPRESS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
