Cases 1 - 10 of 100
American Metallic LLC et al v. Ncase LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00397
Plaintiff:
American Metallic LLC and Dengxu (Kevin) Yu
Defendant:
FormD LLC, Ncase LLC and Dian (Dan) Zhu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05190
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ZHU v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01280
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER ZHU
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv10427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Saunders v. Trump et al
as 2:2026cv00801
Plaintiff:
Lisa Lin Saunders
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Rosie Rivera, Oscar Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ZHU v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv01788
Plaintiff:
YUN ZHU
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv05883
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MetaQuotes Ltd. v. MetaQuotes Technology Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2026cv02688
Defendant:
Micah Samuel, MetaQuotes Technology Co., Ltd. and Cheng Zhu
Plaintiff:
MetaQuotes Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
ZHU v. PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.
as 1:2026cv25619
Plaintiff:
XIANOYAN ZHU
Defendant:
PRINCESS CRUISE LINES, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Pearson et al v. Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
as 3:2026cv08470
Plaintiff:
Corinne Pearson, Siratul Mustakim, Ken Zhu and others
Defendant:
Hims & Hers Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
