Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv07776
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RAMADHAN v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv01948
Plaintiff:
GINANJAR CAESAR RAMADHAN
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Caesar Oruade v. USA
as 26-5800
Petitioner:
CAESAR ORUADE, aka Caesar Oraude
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Conway v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00187
Plaintiff:
Louis Conway
Defendant:
Jasmine LeCount Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson, Shirley Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
CAESAR v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv06835
Plaintiff:
LINDON CAESAR
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Conway v. Mcclanahan et al
as 2:2026cv03197
Plaintiff:
Louis Conway
Defendant:
Jasmine LeCount Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson, Shirley Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
Conway v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv01372
Plaintiff:
Louis Conway
Defendant:
Rowan Wilson, Shirley Troutman, Madeline Singas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conway v. McClanahan et al
as 2:2026cv00194
Plaintiff:
Louis Conway
Defendant:
Jasmine LeCount McClanahan, Rowan Wilson, Shirley Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Conway v. Mcclanahan et al
as 2:2026cv00382
Plaintiff:
Louis Conway
Defendant:
Jasmine Lecount Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson, Shirley Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Conway v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv05017
Plaintiff:
Louis Conway
Defendant:
Jasmine LeCount Mcclanahan, Rowan Wilson, Shirley Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
