Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Adams v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2026cv00673
Defendant: Core Civic, (f/n/u) Iratukunda, (f/n/u) Desroches and others
Plaintiff: Marcus Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Hopson v. Chavez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff: Ryan Joel Hopson
Defendant: Sergeant G. Chavez, Commander Thomas, Corporal Calderon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Kaipat
as 6:2023cv03094
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: Cling Kaipat
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4246 Petition to Determine Present Mental Condition of Imprisoned Person
Toho Co., Ltd. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2021cv04546
Plaintiff: Toho Co., Ltd.
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 54gf, ABC-CBA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00767
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cling Baynard v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 18-40573
Petitioner - Appellant: CLING MARK BAYNARD
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Baynard v. Stephens We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2015cv00146
Plaintiff: Cling Mark Baynard
Defendant: William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baynard v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2015mc00464
Plaintiff: Cling Mark Baynard
Defendant: Mr. Stephens, Regional Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baynard v. Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2015cv00105
Petitioner: Cling Mark Baynard
Respondent: William Stephens-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cling v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv08142
Plaintiff: Darryl Cling
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?