Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Moody #277807 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00646
Defendant:
Unknown Lackey, Arizona Department of Corrections and Unknown Davis
Plaintiff:
Raymond Moody
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Attinger et al
as 3:2020cv00373
Defendant:
Brenda R. Attinger, Adam T. Fisher, George A. Donadi and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Lackey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lackey v. Perry, Warden
as 2:2019cv00096
Petitioner:
James Lackey
Respondent:
Grady Perry, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WASHINGTON v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2019cv01461
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GILMORE, LIEUTENANT TROUT, UNIT MANAGER LACKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WASHINGTON v. CAPTAIN CRUM et al
as 2:2019cv01460
Plaintiff:
JEROME JUNIOR WASHINGTON
Defendant:
MAJOR BAZUS, LT. TROUT, CERT TEAM JOHN DOES 1 TO 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Lackey v. Warden London Correctional Insitution
as 3:2019cv00246
Petitioner:
Eddie M Lackey
Respondent:
Warden London Correctional Insitution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lackey v. Pima County Jail
as 4:2019cv00406
Plaintiff:
John D Lackey
Defendant:
Pima County Jail, Mark Napier, Pima County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Rankin et al
as 4:2019cv04151
Defendant:
Jenn Bull, J Johnson, Raitlyn Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodington v. Barren et al
as 1:2019cv00764
Defendant:
Sgt. Williams, Joe Barren, Corp Shildt and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Alan Woodington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. St. Paul Travelers Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01454
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Counselor Kessel, Nurse Blackmon and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
