Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lawrence Bailey v. Thompson Creek Window Company
as 21-2345
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAWRENCE BAILEY and WILLIAM ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMPSON CREEK WINDOW COMPANY, a Maryland Corporation and RICK WUEST
Bailey et al v. Thompson Creek Window Company et al
as 8:2021cv00844
Plaintiff:
William Estrada and Lawrence Bailey
Defendant:
Rick Wuest and Thompson Creek Window Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey et al v. PHH Mortgage Corporation et al
as 8:2020cv02577
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA National Association, OCWEN Loan Servicing LLC, PHH Mortgage Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
lawrence bailey and deborah bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Flowers - Williams et al
as 2:2020cv10188
Defendant:
Lawrence Bailey, Cynthia (Cindy) Flowers - Williams, Juanita Bynum and others
Plaintiff:
Sherline Teressa Jones
Bailey v. Barber
as 2:2018cv00369
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Kinney Lawrence Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Aliane v. Bailey et al
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Malek Bouzid Aliane
Defendant:
Lawrence Bailey, Jason Roessner, Mark H Stroh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHH Mortgage Corporation v. Bailey
as 3:2015cv00314
Plaintiff:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Lawrence Bailey III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. McCool et al
as 2:2014cv00648
Petitioner:
Kinney Lawrence Bailey
Respondent:
Tom McCool and Paula Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chapman v. United States [central] government
as 0:2011cv61969
Plaintiff:
Christopher Chapman and Roanne Eye
Defendant:
United States [central] government, Federico A. Moreno, Rick Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
FRYE et al v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv81350
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE BAILEY
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
