Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Shutes v. Westbrook et al
as 2:2026cv00093
Plaintiff:
Justin Anthony Shutes
Defendant:
Veronica Westbrook, Richard T Ball, Sarah Huckabee-Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shutes v. Breedlove et al
as 4:2026cv00548
Plaintiff:
Travis Shutes
Defendant:
Breedlove and WellPath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shutes v. Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC et al
as 1:2026cv05954
Plaintiff:
Alzada Shutes
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, House of Cheatham LLC, Loreal USA, Inc. and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sajid Raza v. State of New Jersey, et al
as 26-2210
Plaintiff:
SAJID RAZA
Defendant:
COUNTY OF CAMDEN, TOWNSHIP OF GLOUCESTER, DAVID J. VANNONI, Police Officer and others
Tuvell v. Haley et al
as 1:2026cv12088
Plaintiff:
Pro se Litigant Walter Tuvell
Defendant:
Maureen Mulligan, Martha Brennan, James Budreau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Austin v. Dart et al
as 1:2026cv02312
Plaintiff:
Larry Austin
Defendant:
Tom Dart, Doctor John Doe, Div 9 Superintendant John Doe and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shutes v. Washington et al
as 4:2025cv01195
Plaintiff:
Justin Anthony Shutes
Defendant:
Florida Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuvell v. Haley et al
as 1:2025cv10566
Defendant:
Christopher Haley, Amanda Haley, Autum Haley and others
Plaintiff:
Pro se Litigant Walter Tuvell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gatlin v. Welle et al
as 4:2025cv00042
Defendant:
CITY OF ST. LOUIS, Chad Goodwin, St. Louis County and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gatlin v. Welle et al
as 4:2025cv00043
Defendant:
Matthew Shute, The City of Saint Louis, Surescan Technology, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gatlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
