Cases 1 - 10 of 859
Brothers v. First Bank of the Lake et al
as 4:2024cv01828
Plaintiff:
Clayton Tuttle Brothers, IV
Defendant:
First Bank of the Lake, Sandy Dasigenis, Jeff Leva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Russell Lindquist v. Vicki Taylor, et al
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, individually and officially as Assistant Chief Judge in Dakota County (DC), First Judicial District, Keith M. Ellison, officially as Minnesota Attorney General, Matt Smith, officially as DC Manager and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mirinaviciene v. Keuka College
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
STACEY MIRINAVICIENE
Defendant:
KEUKA COLLEGE, AMY STOREY, BRADLEY FUSTER and others
United States of America v. Tuttle
as 24-908
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RONALD TUTTLE
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
TUTTLE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03267
Plaintiff:
MEGAN TUTTLE
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Not Yet Classified:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Todd Dean v. Mrs. Brown
as 24-6202
Plaintiff:
TODD GLENN DEAN
Defendant:
MRS. BROWN, Warden, MRS. BLUNT, Counselor, MR. PAYNE, Case Manager and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
