Cases 61 - 70 of 825,738
Miles v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Andre Miles
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renewed Hope Clinical Services, LLC et al v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 3:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Renewed Hope Clinical Services, LLC and Raincross Family Counseling, Inc.
Defendant:
Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
MCCANTS v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO
as 2:2024cv05837
Plaintiff:
GEORGE MCCANTS
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE & CO doing business as JP MORGAN CHASE BANK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Craig Dobbs, et al v. United States
as 24-1942
Plaintiff:
Craig Dobbs and Eileen Dobbs
Defendant:
United States of America
Richard Blackwell v. Social Security Admin., et al
as 24-1943
Plaintiff:
Richard Preston Blackwell
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Centerra, City of Saint Paul and others
USA v. Efrain Leonides-Seguria
as 24-1765
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EFRAIN LEONIDES-SEGURIA
Anderson #119801 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 2:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Anderson
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry and Ryan F Thornell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
(PC) Nieto v. Allison et al
as 4:2024cv02628
Plaintiff:
Deputy D.A. Michael Nieto
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison, Hernandez, Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
