Cases 81 - 90 of 536
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv04016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Patent Armory Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Welsh v. USA et al
as 4:2023cv00712
Defendant:
Meta, USA, Ghan & Cooper Commercial Properties and others
Plaintiff:
Quizel Welsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Woodfield v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00780
Plaintiff:
Chris Woodfield
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., X Corp., X Holdings I, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2104 Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act
In Re DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) Subpoena to X Corp ("Twitter")
as 3:2023mc80186
In Re:
DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) SUBPOENA TO X CORP. ("TWITTER") and DMCA 17 U.S.C. 512(h) Subpoena to X Corp ("Twitter")
Petitioner:
Michael Wiliams
McMillian v. Musk et al
as 3:2023cv03461
Plaintiff:
Courtney McMillian
Defendant:
Elon Musk, X Holdings Corp. and X CORP., Successor in Interest to TWITTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hall v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-1555
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL E. HALL, a/k/a Sensa Verogna
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES
Cofield et al v. Passport Motors Holding Inc., et al.
as 1:2023cv01795
Plaintiff:
Dr. Keenan Cofield, Laverne Thompson, Kayla Nedd and others
Defendant:
X Corp, as successor in interest to named Defendant Twitter, Inc., PASSPORT MOTORS HOLDINGS, INC., U.S. Attorneys Office and others
Trustee:
Patricia B Jefferson and Hon. Patricia B. Jerfferson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Ma v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03301
Petitioner:
Fabien Ho Ching Ma
Respondent:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
