Cases matching "Woodforest National Bank"
Cases 41 - 50 of 105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01422
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00446
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00494
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Robertson v. Metlife Securities, Inc.
as 18-1236
Plaintiff - Appellant: Fredia Robertson, as Guardian for Mary Katherine Hart
Defendant - Appellee: Metlife Securities, Inc., Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Metlife of Upstate New York and others
Defendant: Markia L Merritt, Debbie Merritt, Xerox Corporation and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv01003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Vasquez v. Woodforest National Bank NA
as 8:2018cv00572
Plaintiff: Debbie Moreno Vasquez
Defendant: Woodforest National Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Al's Pals Pet Care et al v. Woodforest National Bank NA et al
as 4:2017cv03852
Plaintiff: Al's Pals Pet Care , DeFabio Spine & Sports Rehab , Julie Rudiger, Inc. and others
Defendant: Woodforest National Bank NA , Merchants Choice Payment Solutions and Paysafe Payment Processing Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronnie Ceasar v. Equiafax Credit Reporting, et al
as 17-30854
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONNIE R. CEASAR
Defendant - Appellee: EQUIAFAX CREDIT REPORTING, WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK HOUSTON, WOODFOREST NATIONAL BANK ALEXANDRIA and others
Ceasar v. Equiafax Credit Reporting et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01167
Plaintiff: Ronnie R Ceasar
Defendant: Equiafax Credit Reporting, Woodforest National Bank Houston, Woodforest National Bank Alexandria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?