Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 131 - 140 of 417,984
Nofflett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00251
Petitioner: Joseph Nofflett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moore v. State of Wisconsin
as 2:2024cv00603
Petitioner: Keonta Latrez Moore
Respondent: State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner: Ramon Flores
Respondent: Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Harrison
as 24-60238
Petitioner: Clarence Martin
Respondent: C. Harrison, Warden, Yazoo City Low
Mallett v. Lumpkin
as 24-10435
Petitioner: Michael Robert Mallett
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner: MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent: PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Ogden v. Turner, et al
as 24-2079
Petitioner: KEVIN K. OGDEN
Respondent: NEIL TURNER, Warden, GUADALUPE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
Williams v. Borla
as 5:2024cv02878
Petitioner: Cameron Williams
Respondent: Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennings et al v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00877
Petitioner: Antonio Bennings and Addison Bennings
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner: Roger Ussery
Respondent: State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified: Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?