Cases 81 - 90 of 3,715
Clarence Johnson, Jr. v. Joseph Biden, et al
as 21-56329
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, DONALD J. TRUMP, BARACK OBAMA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv09507
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nyama v. United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv03037
Plaintiff:
Yunan Idris Nyama
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph R Biden, Jr, Biden Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lim v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA et al
as 2:2021cv01277
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank NA, Goh Chok Tong, President Barack Obama and others
JOHNSON, JR. v. REV. MOODY et al
as 2:2021cv19426
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE D. JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
REV. MOODY, JOSEPH ROBINETTE BIDEN, JR., DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stafford v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv12488
Plaintiff:
Felix Stafford
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Obama, Donald J. Trump and others
Lewis v. Lewis et al
as 2:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Otis Eugene Lewis, Donald Trump, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young et al v. Zuckerberg et al
as 2:2021cv01710
Plaintiff:
La Shaun Mauquis Young, Loretta Young and Neisha Walker
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Louis Farrakhan, George W. Bush, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ENDRE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2021cv00349
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. ENDRE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, MICHAEL CARVAJAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Sharp v. Center for Disease Control et al
as 1:2021cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald Sharp and Donald Thomas Sharp
Defendant:
Center for Disease Control, Bill Gates and Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
