Cases 11 - 20 of 193,149
LOCKETT v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant:
ARAMARK, FOX, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff:
RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Unknown Part(y)(ies)
as 2:2024cv11555
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Armstrong
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stampone #713769 v. Parnall Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Frederick Stampone #713769
Defendant:
Parnall Correctional Facility, Noah Nagy, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. Management and Training Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
Management and Training Corp., Warden Jennifer Brown, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hightower v. Kelly
as 1:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
Randy Hightower
Defendant:
Lt. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gonzalez v. English
as 2:2024cv00739
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez
Defendant:
Sara English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Dremel et al
as 2:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Lamanuel Wolfe
Defendant:
Robert Dremel, Jenny Vallaincourt, Sara English and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrison #151760 v. NaphCare Incorporated
as 2:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee Garrison
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benavidez (PS) v. Gilden et al
as 1:2024cv01639
Plaintiff:
Isaac Benavidez
Defendant:
Jane Gilden and Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
