Cases 61 - 70 of 355
Williams v. Fahey
as 3:2009cv00769
Petitioner:
Danial J. Williams
Respondent:
Helen Fahey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tiedemann v. Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints
as 5:2009cv03231
Plaintiff:
Edgar Tiedemann
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ Latter Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De'Lonta v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv01167
Plaintiff:
Ophelia De'Lonta
Defendant:
Gene Johnson, Eddie L. Pearson, P. C. Hunnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanford v. Riches et al
as 3:2009cv00439
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Stanford
Defendant:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Leroy King, Laura Pendergest-Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Ghostbusters, The
as 1:2009cv01606
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Ghostbusters, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holland v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2009cv00522
Petitioner:
Albert R. Holland, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Riches v. The Guinness Book of Records, et al
as 2:2009cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
The Guinness Book of Records, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. LexisNexis Group et al
as 1:2009cv06118
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
LexisNexis Group, West Group, West's Federal Reporter, Third Series and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernest DeWayne Jones v. Robert K. Wong
as 2:2009cv02158
Petitioner:
Ernest DeWayne Jones and Ernest DeWayne Jones
Respondent:
Robert K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Hatch v. USA
as 1:2009cv00144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Hatch
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
