Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 241,700
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00532
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cymbidium Restoration, LLC v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv01316
Plaintiff: Cymbidium Restoration, LLC
Defendant: U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. (2015A+), U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. (AHP) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Amherst Psychiatric Services v. Change Healthcare Inc.
as 3:2024cv00312
Plaintiff: Amherst Psychiatric Services
Defendant: Change Healthcare Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Gentry et al v. Tennessee Department of Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff: Howard Gentry and Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, Tennessee, The
Defendant: Tennessee Department of Treasury, David H. Lillard, Jr. and The Nashville Community Bail Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toj-Riz v. Garland
as 24-9533
Petitioner: SANTIAGO TOJ-RIZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Deafueh Monbo v. Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., et al
as 24-7074
Plaintiff: Deafueh Monbo
Defendant: Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., Creigh Northrop Team, PC, doing business as Northrop Realty, Gail Poole-Vaugh and others
Fruzzetti v. Town Counsel Chair, et al
as 24-1247
Plaintiff: LEE FRUZZETTI
Defendant: TOWN COUNSEL CHAIR, Town of Plymouth, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, DANIEL PERRY, Easton Police Detective and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1473
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Kenneth Thomas
as 24-1845
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: KENNETH THOMAS
PDQ Services, Inc. v. El et al
as 1:2024cv01155
Plaintiff: RADCO Residential
Defendant: Shtoolah El and All Other Occupants
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?