Forfeiture / Penalty Cases filed in District of Columbia matching "A. D"
Cases 31 - 40 of 878,608
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff: Philip J Yoder
Defendant: Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00805
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Bolster v. Speedway LLC
as 2:2024cv11260
Plaintiff: Jill Bolster
Defendant: Speedway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11258
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Preston v. Bonn
as 2:2024cv11254
Petitioner: Harvey Lee Preston
Respondent: John Bonn
NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. CAP SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2024cv06075
Petitioner: NEW JERSEY BUILDING LABORERS STATEWIDE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent: CAP SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
King v. Watson
as 2:2024cv02365
Petitioner: Richard N. King
Respondent: Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HENDERSON v. BERNARD
as 4:2024cv00067
Petitioner: TAVARRES HENDERSON and JUHIIV ALI MUHAMMIED
Respondent: TERRY BERNARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schnoblen v. DTE Energy Company et al
as 2:2024cv11263
Plaintiff: Michael Schnoblen
Defendant: DTE Energy Company and DTE Energy Corporate Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Morel v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00785
Plaintiff: Melody B. Morel
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?