Cases 31 - 40 of 125
GRIFFIN v. ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
as 2:2017cv00106
Defendant:
ADVANCED CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
Plaintiff:
RONALD RAYMOND GRIFFIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coats v. Puett et al
as 5:2017cv06022
Plaintiff:
Charles LeRoy Coats, Jr
Defendant:
Bill Puett, Cates and Advanced Corrections Healthcare Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koch v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc
as 2:2017cv00127
Plaintiff:
Ian Daniel Koch
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. Regalado et al
as 5:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Mack
Defendant:
(fnu) Regalado, (fnu) Anderson, (fnu) Floberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winnett v. Advanced Correctional Healthcare
as 4:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
William T. Winnett, II
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southard v. Barr et al
as 3:2017cv03010
Plaintiff:
Benny Southard
Defendant:
Wess Barr, Beck, Durr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillock v. Saunders County, Nebraska et al
as 4:2016cv03190
Defendant:
Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc., Brian Styskal, Saunders County Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
John Gillock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Lewis v. Boone County Missouri et al
as 2:2016cv04270
Plaintiff:
Glen Earl Lewis
Defendant:
Boone County Missouri, Boone County MO Elected Officials, Boone County MO Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Mikutis et al
as 2:2016cv01319
Plaintiff:
Travis Delaney Williams
Defendant:
Kurt Mikutis, Denise Jarvela, Darron Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Hatcher et al
as 3:2016cv02590
Plaintiff:
Justin E. Lee
Defendant:
Lisa Hatcher, f/n/u Witherspoon, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
