Cases 21 - 30 of 828,973
KERR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
SUSAN KERR
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, JACOB PORTER, UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barberi v. Julio & Sons Tires Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv22135
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Defendant:
Julio & Sons Tires Corp. and Perrine 9911 Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 1:2024cv22130
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofer v. Roher
as 1:2024cv22132
Appellant:
Raziel Ofer
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark S. Roher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal
Jones v. The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kelin Jones
Defendant:
The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
HALE v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00202
Plaintiff:
JOHN HALE
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Huntsman International LLC et al v. AETNA Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Huntsman International LLC and THE HUNTSMAN INTERNATIONAL LLC EMPLOYEE WELFARE BENEFITS PLAN
Defendant:
AETNA Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Satterfield v. Lauderdale
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Margaret Hill Satterfield
Defendant:
Angie K. Lauderdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk55785
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk55784
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
