Cases 101 - 110 of 830,911
Brown
as 2:2024cv02423
Petitioner:
Theotis Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Peerless Indemnity Company et al v. Immanuel Baptist Church et al
as 3:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Peerless Indemnity Company and Peerless Insurance Company
Defendant:
Immanuel Baptist Church, Alvin Clark, Fred K. Adkins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024bk09010
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Us Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Lydia Adams
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Grant v. US Bank National Association
as 8:2024cv01486
Plaintiff:
Michele K Grant
Defendant:
US Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Holman et al v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Rodney S Perry, Sr, Gregory A Jones, Darcell Andre McCants and others
Defendant:
Ron Neal and Debra Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Microsoft Corp.
as 1:2024cv11585
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Brown
Defendant:
Microsoft Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Culler v. Super Dad, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Ramona Culler
Defendant:
Super Dad, Inc., Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Changyi Ren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
