Cases 51 - 60 of 829,269
Harmon v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 3:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
Stacie Harmon
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gomez v. Walmart Inc.
as 2:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Gomez
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ProFrac Holdings II, LLC v. Kuzov et al
as 4:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
ProFrac Holdings II, LLC
Defendant:
Jason Kuzov, Mitchell Winnick, Buffalo Creek, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Waters v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00488
Plaintiff:
Cortlen Waters
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins and Karen Whatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dollar v. Anne Arundel County, MD et al
as 1:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
James Jason Dollar
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County, MD, Michael Shier, K. Rivers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Richards v. Schmoker
as 4:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Wayne Schmoker and Executive Director of the Texas Civil Commitment Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heath v J.Pay
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
J.Pay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00624
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Moore et al v. ContainerPort Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Willie E.T. Moore and Rebecca S. Moore
Defendant:
ContainerPort Group, Inc. and Clarence Smith, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
