Cases 101 - 110 of 827,755
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padula et al v. Dinsmore et al
as 3:2024cv00913
Plaintiff:
William Padula, Craig Andrews and VeyeZER, LLC
Defendant:
Ted Dinsmore, Spheregen Holding, LLC and Spheregen Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Carrillo v. Quik Trip Stores
as 2:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Quik Trip Stores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. Toshiba
as 2:2024cv01195
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Toshiba
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stapleton v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02833
Plaintiff:
Ozzie Stapleton
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sims v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02831
Plaintiff:
Reginald Sims
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nevada Agency and Transfer Company v. Blue Water Petroleum Corp. et al
as 3:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Nevada Agency and Transfer Company
Defendant:
Blue Water Petroleum Corp. and Andrew Osichnuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Tapia v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Israel Tapia
Defendant:
Marcus Anderson and Iliana S Magallane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
