Voting Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Pierce et al v. The North Carolina State Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00193
Plaintiff: Rodney D. Pierce and Moses Matthews
Defendant: The North Carolina State Board of Elections, Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon III and others
Amicus Curiae: Roy A. Cooper, III and Joshua H Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
VOTO LATINO et al v. HIRSCH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff: VOTO LATINO, THE WATAUGA COUNTY VOTING RIGHTS TASK FORCE, DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, STACY EGGERS IV and others
Intervenor Defendant: PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McLaughlin et al v. Onslow County Board of Elections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00171
Plaintiff: joseph robert mclaughlin, lori ready-digiovanni and juan carlos beltran
Defendant: onslow county board of elections, jason dedmond, michael a morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul Goldman v. Robert Brink
as 22-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant: PAUL GOLDMAN
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT H. BRINK, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JAMILAH D. LECRUISE, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity, JOHN O'BANNON, Chairman of the State Board of Elections, in his official capacity and others
Defendant: VIRGINIA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of Virginia, in his official capacity
Democratic Party of Virginia et al v. Brink et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv00756
Plaintiff: Democratic Party of Virginia and DCCC
Defendant: Robert H. Brink, Christopher E. Piper, Jamilah D. Lecruise and others
Amicus Curiae: Public Interest Legal Foundation
Intervenor Defendant: Republican Party of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shernoff et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03654
Defendant: Clifford J Edler, Scott Moseley, Howard M Knapp and others
Plaintiff: DSCC and JoAnn Shernoff
Intervenor Defendant: South Carolina Republican Party and Speaker of the South James H. Lucas
Interested Party: Albertus Clea, Family Unit, George Hopkins and others
Petitioner: Senator Harvey Peeler and James ("Jay") H. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
New Virginia Majority Education Fund et al v. Virginia Department of Elections et al
as 3:2020cv00801
Defendant: Christopher Piper, Virginia State Board of Elections, Virginia Department of Elections and others
Plaintiff: New Virginia Majority Education Fund, Virginia Civic Engagement Table and League of Women Voters of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
South Carolina Progressive Network Education Fund v. Andino et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03503
Defendant: Marci Andino, Linda McCall, Clifford J. Edler and others
Plaintiff: South Carolina Progressive Network Education Fund
Petitioner: James H. Lucas, Jay and Harvey Peeler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Women Voters of South Carolina et al v. Andino et al
as 2:2020cv03537
Plaintiff: Family Unit Inc, The, League of Women Voters of South Carolina, George Hopkins and others
Defendant: Clifford J Edler, Linda McCall, Scott Moseley and others
Intervenor Defendant: Senator Harvey Peeler, James H. (Jay) Lucas and Representative James H. (Jay) Lucas
Amicus Curiae: South Carolina Alliance for Retired Americans and Attorney General Alan Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dhillon v. Wobensmith et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant: Linda H Lamone and John C Wobensmith
Plaintiff: Kahan Dhillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1971

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?