Cases 11 - 20 of 104
Agee v. Church et al
as 1:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Ted Agee
Defendant:
FNU Church, FNU Shields, FNU Franklin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Dunbar
as 1:2022cv00962
Petitioner:
Theodore R. Harmon, Theodore Roosevelt Harmon and Ted
Respondent:
Warden Dunbar, Associate Warden M.A. Delafoisse, HSA K. Nolte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FULLER v. ROYSTER et al
as 1:2022cv00190
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN A. FULLER
Defendant:
TED S. ROYSTER, ALLEN B. MARTIN and TIMOTHY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travis Ball v. Jonathan English
as 21-7768
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVIS AARON BALL
Defendant / Appellee:
CAPTAIN JONATHAN ENGLISH, Captain at the Regional Jail, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, Facility and TED HULL, Superintendent at the Regional Jail
Doyle v. Hull et al
as 3:2021cv00640
Plaintiff:
Jesse Steven Doyle
Defendant:
Ted Hull, LT Ball, C/O Laws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Commissioner of W.V.D.O.C. et al
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
John Sines, Brian Reed, Kim Blair and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2020ct03355
Defendant:
P.A. M. Van Sickle, Dr. S. Ted Shalkewitz, C. Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv03473
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Glidden v. Wilson et al
as 2:2020cv02973
Defendant:
Scarlet Wilson and Ted Smith
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Glidden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Prasad v. Newsome, et al.
as 3:2020cv00582
Defendant:
LFP, Inc. doing business as Hustler Magazine and Ted Newsome
Plaintiff:
Sundari K. Prasad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
