Cases 21 - 30 of 345
Hale et al v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Oswald Hale and Mary Dillehay Hale
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Three H Coal Company, Inc. v. DOWCP
as 23-1486
Petitioner:
THREE H COAL COMPANY, INC. and OLD REPUBLIC INSURANCE COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and RAY L. HALE
Thacker v. Scott et al
as 7:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Justin Alan Thacker
Defendant:
Nurse Scott, Nurse Hale, Nurse Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Hale et al
as 8:2023cv00901
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Phillip Hale, Samantha Baltzersen, Roderick Link and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Vonell Davis, Jr. v. Wayne Hill
as 23-6212
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VONELL DAVIS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. WAYNE HILL, MS. MARIA MAXINO-SABUNDAYO, MR. VERNON CROWELL and others
Sigoloff v. Austin et al
as 1:2023cv00230
Plaintiff:
Samuel Sigoloff
Defendant:
Lloyd J Austin, III, Christine Wormuth, Anthony R. Hale and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HALE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE HALE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SSAOGCOMMS and US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE - SOCIAL SECURITY NOTICING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Meeks v. Hales et al
as 5:2023cv00669
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Meeks
Defendant:
Christopher Hales, Town of Cameron and Cameron, Town of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hale v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00026
Petitioner:
Vance Lamont Hale
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ray Hale v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
as 22-2291
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY LEWIS HALE
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
