Cases 31 - 40 of 148
Johnson v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00608
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Johnson
Defendant:
Johnson, G. Prout, Pilant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEY v. HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2017cv00520
Plaintiff:
JOHN THOMAS COLEY
Defendant:
HIGH POINT POLICE DEPARTMENT, B. J. BARNES, K. WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas et al v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv02954
Plaintiff:
Linda Lucas and B. J. L.
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Charles Gregg-El v. John Doe
as 17-6493
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES GREGG-EL, a/k/a Charles Gregg
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Health Services Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections, MR. WHITED, RNCB; Keen Mountain Correctional Center, R. SANDIFER, Institutional Ombudsman; Keen Mountain Correctional Center and others
Curry v. Roberts et al
as 1:2017cv00342
Plaintiff:
Stacy Curry
Defendant:
B. J. Roberts and Ded Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua Paternoster-Cozart v. Bob McCabe
as 17-6189
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSHUA PATERNOSTER-COZART
Respondent - Appellee:
BOB MCCABE, Acting Superintendent of Hampton Roads Regional Jail
Defendant:
HAMPTON CIRCUIT COURT, LINDA SMITH, Clerk, HAMPTON SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Goist v. Meeks
as 9:2017cv00434
Petitioner:
Paul Benjamin Goist
Respondent:
B J Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MOBLEY v. BARNES
as 1:2017cv00115
Plaintiff:
JASON DARNELL MOBLEY
Defendant:
B. J. BARNES, GUILFORD COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COURT SERVICES BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEFIORE v. GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2016cv01263
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ROBERT DEFIORE
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY JAIL, GLADWELL and B. J. BARNES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIlwain v. Meeks
as 8:2016cv03421
Petitioner:
Martiquous J McIlwain
Respondent:
B J Meeks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
