Cases 31 - 40 of 191
Saunders v. Jividen et al
as 2:2021cv00250
Defendant:
CHP Tuney, Kim Thacker, AWS Frame and others
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders and Quauntel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boggs et al v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 2:2021cv00236
Defendant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Rice Boggs and Charles Boggs, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Boggs v. Yin
as 8:2021cv00839
Defendant:
Peichen Yin
Plaintiff:
Deborah Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Hudson v. Boggs
as 1:2021cv00029
Respondent:
Warden Boggs
Petitioner:
Bevin Hudson and Biven Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 f
BOGGS v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv00050
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
CHERYL L BOGGS and CHERYL L. BOGGS
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2020cv03471
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Plaintiff:
Sheree Letish Boggs
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JOHNSON v. GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL et al
as 1:2020cv00889
Defendant:
SERGEANT TAYLOR, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL, GUILFORD COUNTY CENTRAL JAIL TACTICAL TEAM and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Ziegler v. Charles Rider
as 20-1702
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES RIDER and JEFFREY D. BOGGS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH R. ZIEGLER
Richard Boggs v. US
as 20-1672
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD E. BOGGS
Defendant:
PETER RAE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
