Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Clark v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv08733
Plaintiff:
Classie M. Clark
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Scott v. US Bank NA
as 12-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
US BANK NA, MERS CORPORATION, INC, f/k/a Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc, DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC and others
Scott v. Clark et al
as 8:2011cv02864
Plaintiff:
Edmond Scott
Defendant:
M. Clark, G. Whittington, Almiroudis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2011cv00017
Plaintiff:
Doris M. Clark
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Arambula v. Clark
as 3:2010cv00121
Plaintiff:
Tony Arambula
Defendant:
M. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark et al v. AW Chesterton Company et al
as 0:2009cv03071
Plaintiff:
Robert GLenn Clark and Tammy M Clark
Defendant:
AW Chesterton Company, Alfa Laval Inc, Amchem Products Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Scott v. US Bank, NA et al
as 2:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
US Bank, NA, MERS Corporation, Inc., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. US Bank, NA et al
as 2:2009mc00019
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Scott
Defendant:
US Bank, NA, MERS Corporation, Inc., DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc. and others
Chambers v. Clark
as 2:2009cv00172
Plaintiff:
David Chambers
Defendant:
M. Clark
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
