Cases 31 - 40 of 486
RAMON v. HANES BRANDS, INC.
as 1:2023cv00173
Plaintiff:
VERONICA RAMON
Defendant:
HANES BRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Harper et al v. Harper
as 1:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Joseph Harper and Veronica Williams
Defendant:
Sierra Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Williams et al v. Harper
as 1:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Veronica Williams and Joseph Harper
Defendant:
Sierra Harper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Eric Darden v. Roy Cooper
as 23-1109
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ERIC DARDEN, Administrator for the Estate of Veronica Darden
Defendant / Appellee:
SETH J. FRAZIER, in his individual capacity, THOMAS ASHLEY, in his individual capacity, JEFFREY BAKER, in his individual capacity and others
Dean v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Veronica Sue Dean
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnston v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Johnston
Defendant:
FCI Mcdowell Dental Service, Doc. Veronica Brown, Asst. Megan Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TISDALE v. WEAVIL et al
as 1:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
IVORY JOE TISDALE
Defendant:
T.A. WEAVIL, VERONICA L. EDMISTEN and STEPHEN W. COLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROMAN v. HANESBRANDS, INC.
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Veronica Roman
Defendant:
HANESBRANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
