Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 61 - 70 of 182
Geist v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00116
Plaintiff: James Edmund Geist
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Edmunds v. Nestle USA Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2017cv00229
Plaintiff: Macio Edmunds, Jr
Defendant: Nestle Dreyers Ice Cream Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04079
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Barnard v. USA
as 1:2016cv01283
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Phillip Edmund Barnard, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kapelczak et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv09494
Plaintiff: Yvonne Kapelczak and Edmund Kapelczak
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00754
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Miller v. Gaujot et al
as 2:2016cv00050
Plaintiff: Teresa Miller
Defendant: Phillip D. Gaujot, Edmund Rollo, Stephen Fitiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McGill Brothers, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00313
Plaintiff: Carrie Denise Jones
Defendant: McGill Brothers, Inc. and Darryl Edmund Baine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Gaujot et al
as 3:2016cv00065
Plaintiff: Teresa Miller
Defendant: Phillip D. Gaujot, Edmund Rollo, Stephen Fitiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DonSurvi Chisolm v. Jennifer Franklin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-6498
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONSURVI CHISOLM, a/k/a Don-Survi Chisolm
Defendant - Appellee: JENNIFER FRANKLIN, JESSICA EDMUNDS, Postal/Mailroom Coordinator for South Carolina Dept. of Corr. and MICHAEL MCCOLL, Director of SCDC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?