Cases 1 - 10 of 426
White v. Lawrenz et al
as 1:2024cv04118
Defendant:
Major Lisa Young, Ron Lawrenz, Mr. Atkinson and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00466
Respondent:
Warden Cutright
Petitioner:
Kathleen Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
RAMOS v. FLINT
as 1:2024cv00700
Defendant:
WILLIAM FLINT
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THEODORE RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS v. FLINT et al
as 1:2024cv00678
Defendant:
CPT RODRIGUEZ, CPT WILLIAM FLINT, OFFICER M. SHEFFIELD and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT THEODORE RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raul Ramos Guido v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1711
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Petitioner:
RAUL ORLANDO RAMOS GUIDO
Ramos et al v. Towers Construction, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ramos and Christian Aguilar
Defendant:
Towers Construction, LLC, Carpentry Services, Inc., Hitt Contracting, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Phoenix et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv03249
Plaintiff:
Michael B Neely, Frank S Miller, John Murrisky and others
Defendant:
Dupont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc, The 3M Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1445 Immigration: Application for Naturalization
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
