Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Hairston v. McGuire
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert David Hairston
Defendant:
Officer W. W. McGuire, R. S. Dyson, Sgt. C. C. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abels v. Mason County Commission et al
as 2:2021cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Abels
Defendant:
Mason County Commission, Jackson County Commission, City of Ravenswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Unknown
as 3:2020cv00686
Plaintiff:
J C Butler
Defendant:
Unknown, Hampton Police, City of Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Butler et al
as 8:2018cv03102
Defendant:
Alex Echeandia, Penny Mac, Fifth Third Bank Mortgage and others
Plaintiff:
Wendy Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv12637
Plaintiff:
Cleta C. Butler
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Al-Haqq v. Stirling et al
as 2:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Bilal A Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Byran P Stirling, John Pate, McKendly Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09552
Plaintiff:
Dorothy M. Butler and Larry C. Butler, Sr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Provident Financial Services, Inc. v. BB&H Enterprises, LLC, et al
as 5:2012cv00135
Plaintiff:
Provident Financial Services, Inc.
Defendant:
BB&H Enterprises, LLC and William C. Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Conaty v. Lohman et al
as 2:2011cv00014
Plaintiff:
Barry Conaty
Defendant:
Renee M. Lohman , The Lohman Group, Inc. , Matthew D. Levy and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Warren Chase v. C. Butler
as 09-6224
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WARREN CHASE
Defendant - Appellee:
C. BUTLER, Cpl., D. HICKS, Cpl., MICHAEL HICKS, Cpl. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
