Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Smith v. Pough et al
as 6:2022cv04451
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith
Defendant:
Freddie Pough, Velvet McGowan, Chenelle Okoro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Lincoln Assurance Co. of Boston
as 1:2021cv01635
Defendant:
Lincoln Assurance Co. of Boston
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
James McConnell v. Watauga County
as 19-1666
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES WATAUGA COUNTY, JENNIFER SMITH, WATAUGA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIM MCCONNELL and JAMES EDWARD MCCONNELL
Timothy Hankins, Sr. v. The State of North Carolina
as 19-1520
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JENNIFER SMITH ECHOLS, CHAD AXFORD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY OMAR HANKINS, SR.
CARTLIDGE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Defendant:
JENNIFER SMITH and PENN BROYHILL
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MARSELL CARTLIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hankins v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 7:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hankins
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, Mary Jean Gurganus, Chad Axford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McConnell et al v. Watauga County et al
as 5:2017cv00195
Plaintiff:
James Edward McConnell and Kim McConnell
Defendant:
Watauga County, Department of Social Services Watauga County, Thomas Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Berryhill
as 8:2017cv02487
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05099
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
