Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Kelly v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00327
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Kelly et al v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv00024
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper and U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee for Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-RF7
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Kelly and Sharon B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Kelly v. Hotel Equities Group LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00453
Plaintiff:
Michael C Kelly, Sr
Defendant:
Hotel Equities Group LLC and Marriott International Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Kelly v. USA
as 4:2016cv01916
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael David Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
KELLY v. ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. KELLY
Defendant:
ALAMANCE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Michael Kelly
as 15-4653
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAMOND KELLY, a/k/a Michael Raymond Kelly
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Kelly
as 2:2015cv00399
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Michael E. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00285
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Kelly et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv32511
Plaintiff:
Mary D. Kelly and Michael R. Kelly
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bloom v. The Board of Education of Monogalia County et al
as 1:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Bloom
Defendant:
The Board of Education of Monogalia County , Barbara L. Parsons , Michael L. Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
