Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Johnson v. Adams et al
as 5:2022cv02129
Plaintiff:
Beatrice V Johnson
Defendant:
Tanya Adams, Joyce Rice, Janet White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Johnson v. USA - 2255
as 1:2017cv02336
Petitioner:
Christopher V. Johnson
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Christopher Johnson
as 15-4632
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER V. JOHNSON, a/k/a Christopher Miller, a/k/a Milla on Deck
Johnson v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06151
Plaintiff:
Montelle V. Johnson
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brenda Johnson et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2014cv02324
Plaintiff:
Brenda Johnson , Pearl Torres , Grace Johnson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Dore et al
as 8:2012cv03394
Plaintiff:
Evelyn V. Johnson
Defendant:
Thomas P. Dore, Wells Fargo Bank, NA, Wachovia Bank, NA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
The State of North Carolina et al v. Minister I Am Triumphant Ali
as 5:2011cv00683
Plaintiff:
The State of North Carolina, Department of Justice, Roy Cooper and others
Defendant:
Minister I Am Triumphant Ali
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. United States
as 3:2011cv00661
Plaintiff:
Shelia V Johnson
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Harcum v. Baltimore County Bureau of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv03608
Plaintiff:
Ignatius L. Harcum, Jr.
Defendant:
Baltimore County Bureau of Corrections, James P. Oneill, Deborah J. Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
