Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York matching "S"
Cases 141 - 150 of 831,391
(PC) Merron v. Cavagnaro
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff: Christopher Ryan Merron
Defendant: Josie M. Cavagnaro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAN et al v. LO et al
as 1:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: CHI HUI TAN and KUNG TUAN TAN
Defendant: VICTOR K S LO and EVER SPRING CO INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
(PC) Woods v. Soares et al
as 2:2024cv01768
Plaintiff: Robert S. Woods
Defendant: Jennifer Soares, Board of Parole Hearings and Jennifer S. Bunker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02757
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nemeth v. New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Campus
as 1:2024cv04762
Plaintiff: Margaret Nemeth
Defendant: New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Irving Medical Campus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Woodall v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff: Bret Woodall
Defendant: Octapharma Plasma, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Danielle Scott
as 24-1539
Petitioner: In re: DANIELLE S. SCOTT
Respondent: MELINDA K. BRAMAN, Warden
Fan v. City of Newport Beach, et al.
as 24-3866
Plaintiff: YAXIAN FAN
Defendant: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, in the City of Santa Ana and KEITH E RODEHUIS, KER is the owner of KER Legal Group
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01129
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Rhear et al v. Does
as 4:2024cv00534
Plaintiff: Rose Rhear, Tabatha Moffatt, Tonya Hughes and others
Defendant: Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?