Cases 111 - 120 of 828,976
HELMS v. DAISY
as 1:2024cv06644
Plaintiff:
JESSE HELMS
Defendant:
MIKE DAISY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLEY v. CIGNA GROUP et al
as 1:2024cv06641
Plaintiff:
DENISE FOLEY
Defendant:
CIGNA GROUP, CIGNA HEALTHCARE and HEALTHSPRING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Aderohunmu v. Loretto Health & Rehabilitation Center
as 5:2024cv00731
Plaintiff:
Adeyemi Aderohunmu
Defendant:
Loretto Health & Rehabilitation Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
PASCHALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00849
Plaintiff:
ALICIA PASCHALL
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Burton v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Charles Burton
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez Cruz v. Green et al
as 6:2024cv01009
Plaintiff:
Francisco Rodriguez Cruz
Defendant:
Sherea Green, M. Williams, Pondon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCann v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Braxton McCann
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Zhou v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Ming Zhou
Defendant:
Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Williams v. Pelzer et al
as 5:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Donderrious Williams
Defendant:
Jeremy Pelzer, Michael Jones, Steven Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
