Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Ohio matching "S"
Cases 111 - 120 of 828,160
Battle v. Kinchen
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff: Shanika Battle
Defendant: Stanley Kinchen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jackson v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: Perry Jackson
Defendant: State of Mississippi
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DataCloud Technologies, LLC v. Imperva, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00384
Plaintiff: DataCloud Technologies, LLC
Defendant: Imperva, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Harlow v. USA
as 3:2024cv00925
Plaintiff: Karen Harlow
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
WAGNER v. NAWAZ et al
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff: TERRELL WAGNER
Defendant: ATHER NAWAZ and EAGLE TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
DAVIS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff: JAMES O. DAVIS
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv02257
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination
Manuel v. Fulton County Georgia Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv02254
Plaintiff: Korak Jerome Manuel
Defendant: Fulton County Georgia Police Department, Fulton County Office of the District Attorney, Paul Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00728
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
John Doe v. County of Santa Barbara et al
as 2:2024cv04334
Plaintiff: JANE DOE
Defendant: County of Santa Barbara, Joshua Elizalde and JOHN DOE(S) 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?