Cases 131 - 140 of 840,519
Hill v. Greyhound Bus Inc.
as 1:2024cv04188
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Hill
Defendant:
Greyhound Bus Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04179
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JONES v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv01624
Defendant:
DAVID EMMERSON, S. OBI, E. OSEI and others
Plaintiff:
KAMREN JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colburn v. Daimler Truck North America LLC
as 3:2024cv00531
Defendant:
Daimler Truck North America LLC doing business as Freightliner Trucks
Plaintiff:
Shane Colburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
MCLAURIN v. RUBINO et al
as 2:2024cv09237
Defendant:
CUCCHIARA, CALQUHOUN, DEPINTO and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY MCLAURIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DESPOSITIO v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2024cv09263
Defendant:
WILKS, JOHNSON, NURSE BONISLAWSKI and others
Plaintiff:
SONNY DESPOSITIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dollar Tree Management, LLC v. Swiftly Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Dollar Tree Management, LLC
Defendant:
Swiftly Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Kirby v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2024cv00571
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Petitioner:
Leonard Kirby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boardman v. Perkins
as 3:2024cv05777
Respondent:
Jefferey Perkins
Petitioner:
Thomas Russell Boardman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Thomson Reuters America Corporation
as 1:2024cv00088
Defendant:
Thomson Reuters America Corporation
Plaintiff:
Michael Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
