Cases 11 - 20 of 93
Loyd et al. v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al.
as 4:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Michael Loyd, Zoey Spellman, Jennifer Gray and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corp and Norfolk Southern Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Loyd et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 4:2023cv00626
Plaintiff:
Michael Loyd, Zoey Spellman, Jennifer Gray and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Norfolk Southern Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hall v. Ballad Health
as 2:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Corey Hall, Anna M Ayers, Chloe Burleson and others
Counter Claimant:
Ballad Health
Defendant:
Janice L Nelson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hull Jr. #828926 v. Tahvonen et al
as 1:2022cv00366
Plaintiff:
Omar S. Hull Jr. #828926
Defendant:
Randy Tahvonen, Fred Blackmon, John B. Salmie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Loyde v. Genovese
as 2:2022cv02049
Petitioner:
Ed Loyde
Respondent:
Kevin Genovese
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loyd v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv04881
Plaintiff:
Michelle Loyd
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Demetrius Loyd v. Edith Hacker, et al
as 21-5776
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS LOYD
Defendant / Appellee:
EDITH HACKER and MICHELLE SPURLOCK
Wright v. Department of Defense
as 3:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua L. Wright
Defendant:
Loyd Austin and Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Loyd v. Spurlock et al
as 6:2021cv00081
Defendant:
Michelle Spurlock and Edith Hacker
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyd v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00079
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David Loyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
