Cases 21 - 30 of 997
Almer v. Hanson et al
as 3:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Travis Scott Almer
Defendant:
Justin Hanson, Ronald Kind, Laif Rognlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joseph Wagner v. Lisa Scheirer, et al
as 24-1312
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wagner
Defendant:
Lisa Scheirer, Randall Hukreide, Scott Schroeder and others
Matthew Locke v. County of Hubbard, et al
as 24-1285
Plaintiff:
Matthew Locke
Defendant:
County of Hubbard, Cory Aukes, in his official and individual capacity and Scott Parks, in his official and individual capacity
Eldrenkamp v. Kane et al
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Jeannine Eldrenkamp
Defendant:
Judge Jerry Kane, Judge Scott Brinkmeier, Nicholas Meeker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Husbands v. Rowland et al
as 1:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Husbands
Defendant:
Shelly Rowland, Sabrina Williams, Scott Harwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. US Department of Agriculture
as 4:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
US Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Aho et al v. Cass County et al
as 0:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Aho and Chad Cane
Defendant:
Cass County, Sandy Bennett, Jerri Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, et al v. Judy Henry, et al
as 24-1071
Plaintiff:
Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Luther Oneal Sutter and Lucien R. Gillham
Defendant:
Judy Simmons Henry, Jacob Post Fair, Scott A. Irby and others
Meyer v. Welsch et al
as 0:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Scott Meyer
Defendant:
Olmsted County Court, Hans Holland, "Kim" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
