Cases 81 - 90 of 355
Ophelia De'Lonta v. Gene Johnson
as 08-7282
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OPHELIA DE'LONTA, f/k/a M. Stokes, f/k/a Michael A. Stokes
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, ROBIN HULBERT, ALVIN BASKERVILLE and others
Hatch v. USA
as 1:2009cv00144
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Hatch
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jonathan Riches v. Philip Woolston
as 08-7983
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILIP WOOLSTON, Individually and in his official capacity as Teacher at FCI Williamsburg, STEVE JOBS and APPLE COMPUTER INC.
Riches v. Warden, FCI Williamsburg et al
as 6:2008cv02257
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Williamsburg and John C. McGinley
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Riches v. Steinbrenner
as 1:2007cv01883
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
George Steinbrenner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. HERALD NEWS et al
as 2:2008cv03622
Plaintiff:
IVAN G. MCKINNEY
Defendant:
HERALD NEWS, BERGEN RECORD, NORTH JERSEY MEDIA GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AL-NASHIRI et al v. BUSH et al
as 1:2008cv01207
Petitioner:
ABD AL-RAHIM HUSSAIN MOHAMMED AL-NASHIRI
Respondent:
GEORGE W. BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY, CONDELEEZA RICE and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
RICHES v. DEPP et al
as 2:2007cv05279
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant:
JOHNNY DEPP, KEIRA KNIGHTLEY, ORLANDO BLOOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Kevorkian
as 3:2007cv05420
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Jack Kevorkian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Riches v. Pancho's Mexican Buffet Inc.
as 1:2008cv01067
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Pancho's Mexican Buffet Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
