Cases 21 - 30 of 95,507
Sewell v. Maddox et al
as 2:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Amy Giles Sewell
Defendant:
Thomas N Maddox, City of Elba, Alabama and Harold L. Staley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Pereira v. City of Lakeland, Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02380
Plaintiff:
Julie Pereira
Defendant:
City of Lakeland, Tennessee and KATRINA SHIELDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Russell #747638 v. Fisk et al
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Andrew Michael Russell #747638
Defendant:
Chad Fisk, Jonathan Kraai, Natascha Hirdes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Lewis v. State of Texas
as 24-50453
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
State of Texas, Williamson County, Texas, City of Austin and others
Miller v. Dunn
as 24-10500
Plaintiff:
Bradley B. Miller
Defendant:
Virginia Talley Dunn, Individually, Andrea Plumlee, In both Individual and Official Capacities, Danielle Diaz, In both Individual and Official Capacities and others
DEVLIEGER v. WARREN et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
CARL L DEVLIEGER
Defendant:
CITY OF WARREN and PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. City of Piedmont et al
as 3:2024cv03385
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sanders
Defendant:
City of Piedmont, Brian Castillo and Jasdeep Singh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv04710
Plaintiff:
CURTIS ROBINSON
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Oscar Rangel Salinas, MARK E RAMOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orcutt v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al
as 2:2024cv04701
Plaintiff:
Jane S. Orcutt
Defendant:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Michael C. Tarango, Luke A. Edney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
