Cases 41 - 50 of 13,012
Virginia State Conference NAACP et al v. County School Board of Shenandoah County
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Virginia State Conference NAACP, Heather Brown, Kim Wallace Carter and others
Defendant:
County School Board of Shenandoah County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ronald Emrit v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-2093
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT, Presidential Candidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political ActionCommittee/Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as United Emrits of America
Defendant:
CHIEF JOHN ROBERTS, JUSTICE BRETT M. KAVANAUGH, JUSTICE SAMUEL A. ALITO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-40421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goldman-Brown v. Consumers Energy
as 2:2024cv10902
Plaintiff:
Danielle Goldman-Brown
Defendant:
Consumers Energy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. Cincinnati Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
DaQuan Brown
Defendant:
Cincinnati Police Department, Jacob Hick and Jeffrey Wicezorkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. National Accounts System of Omaha
as 8:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Jack Brown
Defendant:
National Accounts System of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
