Cases 11 - 20 of 72,428
Ratliff et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv04994
Plaintiff:
Semaj Ratliff, Larrion Brown, Rynalder Williams and others
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Stanton
as 2:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Rahshid Williams
Respondent:
Clay Stanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bouza v. FCI-Allenwood-Medium
as 4:2024cv00998
Petitioner:
William T. Bouza
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Allenwood-Medium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Heath v. Eller
as 2:2024cv02414
Petitioner:
William Heath
Respondent:
Warden Bryan Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lemon v. Calhoun
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
William Day'Juan Lemon
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun, III
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rettstatt v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
William Joseph Rettstatt
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Page, III, Micheal Lowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. P.A. PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2024cv02669
Petitioner:
TYRICK WILLIAMS
Respondent:
P.A. PAROLE BOARD, J. RIVELLO, PA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01781
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Bramlett v. Waybourn
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
William Dale Bramlett
Defendant:
Sheriff Bill Waybourn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
