Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 89,882
Travis v. Hamm
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner: Wayne Holleman Travis
Respondent: John Q. Hamm
Kramer v. USA
as 3:2024cv01021
Petitioner: John Lewis Kramer
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Clincy v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff: Trevon Marquise Clincy
Defendant: John Doe
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Attaway v. Glover et al
as 3:2024cv01565
Plaintiff: Micheal N.B. Attaway
Defendant: C/O Glover, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Leposky et al
as 3:2024cv01543
Plaintiff: John U. Singleton
Defendant: G. Leposky, Lightfoot, Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Denelsbeck v. Ramirez et al
as 5:2024cv00145
Plaintiff: John Denelsbeck, III
Defendant: Ricardo Ramirez, Jeremy J. Delacruz and Daniel Miranda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dildy v. City of North Charleston et al
as 2:2024cv03612
Plaintiff: Leangelo Dildy
Defendant: City of North Charleston, John Doe, Jared Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lanham v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff: Levi Lanham
Defendant: Aramark Food Service Corporation, Anthony Booher, Correctional Officer Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenti v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv01083
Plaintiff: John Lenti
Defendant: Angel Quiros, Frankie Cuevas and Sara Tessler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NORDQUIST v. POLISHNOWSKI
as 3:2024cv00285
Petitioner: ERIC JOSEPH NORDQUIST
Respondent: JOHN POLISHNOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?