Cases 1 - 10 of 2,586
Demus v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01575
Petitioner:
Lloyd Eric Demus
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. Clackamas County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 3:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
David Lloyd Pearson
Defendant:
Clackamas County Sheriff's Dept., Clackamas County, Troy Gilmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
St. Rose v. Cruz et al
as 1:2024cv01772
Plaintiff:
Lloyd St. Rose
Defendant:
Ms. Cruz, Zowie Barnes, Ms. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. City of Cape Girardeau et al
as 1:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gilmore
Defendant:
City of Cape Girardeau, Wes Blair, Mark Welker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonilla v. Freeman et al
as 4:2024cv03533
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Judge Beth Labson Freeman and Judge Howard R. Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROWLISON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00301
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ROWLISON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. USA
as 2:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Benjamin Lloyd Frost
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Mumford v. Fulton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02428
Petitioner:
Lloyd Mumford
Respondent:
Fulton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
