Cases 1 - 10 of 5,077
Younan #173538 v. Young
as 2:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Stewart Edward Younan
Defendant:
Adam Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart v. Hogan et al
as 2:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Sammy Stewart
Defendant:
M Hogan, Martin Padilla, Jason Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre Stewart v. United States
as 24-2214
Petitioner:
Pierre Cornelius Stewart
Respondent:
United States of America
STEWART v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv06917
Petitioner:
ROSHAWN STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Xavier Stewart v. Bob Gualtieri, et al
as 24-11935
Plaintiff:
XAVIER DEMERIS STEWART
Defendant:
BOB GUALTIERI, Individual and Official Capacity, BRUCE BARLETT, Individual and Official Capacity, KEN BURKE, Individual and Official Capacity and others
Williams v. Baumgartner et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kent Williams
Defendant:
Karl Baumgartner, Campbell, Krina Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge, Bubba Fudge and Bubba
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fudge v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
James Charles Fudge
Defendant:
ODOC/Office-Pop-Mgr. Greg Jones, TRCI-Doc-Supt. T. Rumsey, TRCI-Doc-Supt. E. Reyes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk v. Kartchner, et al
as 24-4067
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY R.E. RUSK
Defendant:
MONTE KARTCHNER, SIM GILL, CLIFFORD C. ROSS and others
Ford v. Shreveport et al
as 5:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
Tyler Ford
Defendant:
Police Dept of Shreveport, Sheriffs Office of Caddo Parish, Sheriff of Caddo Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
