Cases 1 - 10 of 1,104
Douglas v. Stewart
as 1:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
Dwayne Douglas
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Stewart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. Windom et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Samuel Calvin Allen
Defendant:
Mary B. Windom, Kelli Wise, Officer Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart Manago v. Daniel E. Cueva et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deundra Wilson
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Jackson, Security Warden Unknown Andrews, Chief Unknown Perry and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manago v. Cueva et al
as 3:2024cv00524
Petitioner:
Stewart Manago
Respondent:
Daniel E. Cueva and James Flaherty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Cooley
as 24-30152
Petitioner:
Rolondo Stewart
Respondent:
Keith Cooley, Warden, Allen Correctional Center
Stewart v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2024cv00050
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00805
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stewart v. Collier
as 1:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
Joshua Lynn Stewart
Respondent:
Brian Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
